Common Mistakes When Applying for GSA Product Approval

Securing GSA product approval can open your business to $40 billion in federal procurement opportunities, but many first-time applicants face rejections due to preventable errors.

Here’s what you need to know to avoid delays and compliance risks:

• Key Requirements: Align products with the correct SIN (Special Item Number), ensure TAA compliance (products must originate from approved countries), and provide proper manufacturer authorization.
• Common Mistakes: Wrong SIN selection, incomplete documentation (e.g., pricing, country-of-origin details), and mismatched catalog data.
• Critical Platforms: Use GSA eLibrary for SIN research, GSA Advantage! for accurate listings, and Verified Products Portal (VPP) for manufacturer validation.
• Pricing Pitfalls: Unsustainable discounts, outdated price lists, and failing to disclose commercial pricing practices can lead to rejections or audits.

Avoiding these errors saves time, money, and ensures compliance. Regularly update your catalog, verify TAA compliance, and maintain accurate documentation to stay on track. If the process feels overwhelming, consider working with specialists to streamline your efforts.

GSA Product Approval Basics

What GSA Product Approval Means

GSA product approval ensures that each product meets federal standards by aligning with an approved SIN, adhering to federal regulations, and being backed by proper documentation. Every item must undergo a detailed review and approval process before it can be listed on GSA Advantage! and made available for purchase by government buyers.

Here’s what you need to know about the key requirements:

• SIN Alignment: Your product must match one specific SIN (Special Item Number). Each SIN has a defined scope and target audience, so proper alignment is critical.
• TAA Compliance: Products must be made in or substantially transformed in TAA-designated countries. Items from non-designated countries like China and India are not eligible for GSA Schedules. The country of origin is determined at the item level, and you’ll need to provide evidence, such as manufacturer certificates or bills of lading, to support your claims.
• Manufacturer Authorization: If you’re a reseller or distributor, you must have a Letter of Supply from the manufacturer or be listed as an authorized reseller in GSA’s Verified Products Portal (VPP). This confirms that the manufacturer supports the products you’re offering and that you have the right to sell them.
• Fair and Reasonable Pricing: Your pricing must reflect your commercial sales practices and remain competitive. Documentation of your most favored customer pricing is required to show that government buyers are getting a good deal. Many new GSA Schedule offers are rejected due to pricing issues or incomplete documentation.
• Commercial Availability: Products must have a proven sales history in the commercial market. GSA wants to see that your items are already being sold commercially and not developed solely for government contracts.

By meeting these requirements, you’re better positioned to navigate the approval process and secure placement on GSA Advantage!.

Key Tools and Platforms You’ll Use

Three essential platforms play a major role in the GSA product approval process: GSA eLibrary, GSA Advantage!, and the Verified Products Portal (VPP). Understanding how these systems work together can help you avoid common pitfalls.

• GSA eLibrary: This is your go-to resource for research. It provides the full MAS (Multiple Award Schedule) structure, detailed SIN descriptions, and a searchable database of awarded contractors. Use it to identify the SINs that align with your products. Reviewing competitor listings under your target SINs can also help you refine your offer. Keep in mind that selecting the wrong SIN is a frequent mistake that can lead to proposal rejection.
• GSA Advantage!: This is the public catalog where approved products and prices are displayed for federal buyers. Once your contract is awarded, your products must be listed here with accurate descriptions, part numbers, units of measure, and pricing. The details in your GSA Advantage! listing must match your awarded contract exactly. Discrepancies can trigger audits. Any changes, such as adding products or adjusting prices, must go through the electronic modification (eMod) system. Attempting to update GSA Advantage! without an approved modification is a serious compliance risk.
• Verified Products Portal (VPP): This platform validates manufacturer product data and connects it to Schedule contracts. GSA increasingly relies on VPP to streamline the approval process, making it essential for manufacturers to participate and for resellers to ensure their authorization is properly documented. If you’re a reseller, confirm that your manufacturer has set you up as an authorized partner in the VPP or provide a Letter of Supply as backup documentation.

For small businesses, the process often follows a step-by-step approach:

• Begin with GSA eLibrary to identify the appropriate SINs and analyze competitor offerings.
• Work with your manufacturers to confirm TAA compliance and gather necessary documentation.
• Prepare your pricing files and catalog data, ensuring there are no discrepancies in SKUs, descriptions, or units of measure.
• Submit your offer through eOffer or eMod, and cross-check your submission with what appears on GSA Advantage!.

Consistency across all platforms is crucial. Misaligned data – whether it’s mismatched SKUs, conflicting descriptions, or pricing discrepancies – can lead to delays, audit issues, and compliance challenges. Paying attention to these details will help you navigate the process smoothly and avoid unnecessary setbacks.

Documentation and Authorization Errors

Missing even a single key document can delay or derail your GSA proposal for anywhere between 30 and 120 days. Understanding the common pitfalls can save you from these costly setbacks.

Missing Product Documentation

When product documentation is incomplete, GSA contracting officers will likely request clarification, which can stall your application. Some of the most common missing pieces include technical specifications, up-to-date commercial price lists or invoices that back up your proposed pricing, warranty details, and required compliance certificates. Without recent invoices or published price lists, GSA may reject certain line items as "unsupported pricing."

To avoid these issues, create a thorough GSA documentation checklist that includes:

• A current commercial price list showing your standard pricing structure
• Recent invoices or quotes to validate your proposed pricing
• Detailed product descriptions and specifications, including model numbers, dimensions, and performance data
• Written warranty and return policies
• Relevant safety or performance certifications
• Documentation confirming Trade Agreements Act (TAA) compliance and country-of-origin details
• Internal version control notes, such as document date, owner, and review status

Make sure each item on your checklist aligns directly with the MAS solicitation requirements. Many vendors find it helpful to include a pre-submission review step, where another team member double-checks all documents against the solicitation instructions. This process can catch omissions before your submission reaches GSA. It’s also vital to keep all documents current, as outdated price lists or expired certifications can weaken your proposal.

Once your documentation is in order, the next step is ensuring proper manufacturer authorization for any resold products.

Lack of Manufacturer Authorization

If you’re a reseller or distributor, you’ll need proof that you’re authorized to sell the manufacturer’s products under a GSA contract. According to Verified Products Portal (VPP) requirements, this means securing a valid Letter of Supply when necessary. Common issues include the VPP marking your status as "unauthorized" or flagging "Review LoS Requirements." If this happens, GSA may require you to remove the flagged products from your offer, and unresolved issues could jeopardize your entire submission.

Before submitting your offer or modifications, confirm that each manufacturer is properly registered in the VPP and that you have all required supplier authorization documents. A Letter of Supply on official letterhead should confirm your authorization and ability to support the products. Keep these documents organized in a central repository, and never list products until proper authorization is secured.

If your team lacks the expertise to handle these requirements, consider working with specialists like GSA Focus to ensure your Letter of Supply packages are compliant and your VPP status is verified.

Proper authorization is just one piece of the puzzle – accurate country-of-origin documentation is equally important for TAA compliance.

Incomplete Country-of-Origin Documentation

Incomplete or inaccurate country-of-origin (COO) documentation is a major compliance risk under the Trade Agreements Act (TAA). This is one of the leading causes of contract cancellations and audit findings. Without proper COO records, you risk offering non-TAA-compliant products, which is a direct violation of MAS contract terms.

Acceptable COO documentation includes manufacturer certificates, detailed bills of materials, or formal attestations that confirm the TAA-designated country for each product. Common issues include missing documentation, informal emails instead of formal certificates, and vague country listings like "multiple" or "various."

To stay compliant, establish a product-level COO file that links each SKU to its corresponding certificate, verification date, and owner. Conduct quarterly audits of your COO files to update certificates and ensure they match your GSA catalog. Simple tools like automated reminders and checklists – e.g., "COO verified in the last 12 months?" – can help prevent lapses, especially when supplier or manufacturing changes occur.

Always ensure your COO records align with TAA-designated countries. Avoid relying on marketing labels like "Made in USA" unless backed by proper documentation. Cross-check COO details with how your products are listed on GSA Advantage! and in your price list to avoid mislabeling or misrepresentation. Missteps here can lead to penalties or even jeopardize your contract. Keeping your COO files organized not only simplifies the approval process but also safeguards your contract from audit risks throughout its lifecycle.

Pricing and SIN Alignment Problems

Getting the right SIN (Special Item Number) and pricing in place is crucial to prevent delays and ensure your terms remain profitable.

Wrong SIN Selection

Special Item Numbers (SINs) are classification codes used in the GSA Multiple Award Schedule to group similar products and services. These codes guide contracting officers in finding, evaluating, and awarding contracts for your offerings. Picking the wrong SIN can signal that your product doesn’t fit its intended category, creating hurdles in the approval process.

Choosing the wrong SIN can lead to significant delays. GSA reviewers will flag items that don’t match the SIN’s functional description, often resulting in clarification requests that drag out approval timelines – sometimes by months. In some cases, you may even need to start over and resubmit your proposal. If your products are approved under an incorrect SIN, you could face audits revealing that your items fall outside their approved scope. This can lead to mandatory corrections, lost sales, or even contract termination.

A common mistake vendors make is assigning SINs based on internal labels instead of aligning with GSA’s official definitions. Others try to lump diverse products under a single SIN for convenience, even when the functional descriptions clearly don’t match.

Avoid these issues by doing your homework. Start by reviewing the SIN descriptions and scope notes on the GSA eLibrary. Don’t just glance at the titles – read the detailed requirements, keywords, and exclusions. Compare these descriptions to your product catalog, focusing on the primary function of each product and its typical use cases. Your goal is to align each product with the SIN that best matches its core purpose.

To confirm your choices, check GSA Advantage! and eLibrary for similar products that have already been awarded. If similar items are listed under a different SIN, that’s a warning sign. Keep written justifications for your SIN assignments as part of your proposal and internal records. This documentation not only helps during reviews but also shows that you’ve done your due diligence.

Signs you’ve selected the wrong SIN:

• Your products don’t align with the SIN’s functional description or belong in another Large Category based on industry norms.
• Established schedule holders consistently list similar products under a different SIN.

When in doubt, seek guidance from a GSA-savvy consultant or industry partner to validate your SIN alignment before uploading products to GSA Advantage. Firms like GSA Focus specialize in interpreting SIN definitions and comparing your product-to-SIN mapping with other schedule holders, helping you avoid costly errors.

Pricing Strategy Errors

Once you’ve nailed down the correct SINs, the next step is setting pricing that’s both competitive and compliant.

Pricing mistakes are one of the most common reasons GSA proposals get rejected or require extensive rework. GSA’s pricing expectations differ from typical commercial practices, and many vendors don’t fully understand these rules until they run into problems.

GSA requires federal customers to receive pricing equal to or better than what you offer your Most Favored Customer (MFC) under similar terms and conditions. The MFC is usually a key account, large distributor, or customer segment that benefits from your steepest discounts. If your commercial pricing is more favorable than your GSA pricing, contracting officers may question your pricing integrity and reject your proposal.

Common pricing mistakes include:

• Offering unsustainable discounts. Some vendors propose aggressive GSA discounts to secure a quick win, only to find that these margins are unsustainable over the contract’s potential 20-year lifespan. This approach can backfire, making future pricing modifications harder to negotiate. Remember, the relationship between your GSA and commercial pricing is locked in at the time of award, so overly generous discounts can haunt you for years.
• Failing to disclose commercial discount practices. If you offer certain customers better deals than what’s disclosed in your Commercial Sales Practices (CSP), this can raise red flags during GSA reviews and audits. Omitting details about special pricing programs, volume discounts, or even one-off deals can lead to compliance issues and potential Price Reductions Clause violations.
• Using outdated or inaccurate commercial price lists. Your proposed GSA pricing must be backed by real-world data, such as invoices, quotes, and sales history. If your commercial price list doesn’t reflect actual sales figures, GSA may question your pricing structure, leading to delays or outright rejection.

How to develop a compliant pricing strategy:

Start by building a solid commercial pricing baseline. Your price list should reflect actual market trends, backed by recent invoices, standard discount policies, and customer segments. Use this data to create a clear pricing narrative that explains how your GSA prices relate to your MFC and other commercial customers.

Identify your MFC segment and document any cases where they receive better discounts than your proposed GSA terms. Either adjust your GSA pricing accordingly or provide strong, well-documented reasons for any differences. Avoid arbitrary discount percentages that aren’t supported by historical data or written policies.

Develop multiple pricing models that include all potential costs – shipping, warranties, support, and occasional spot discounts. Use real data to justify your numbers, and leave room for price adjustments that won’t violate contract terms. Consider offering volume-based or term-based discount tiers that reward larger orders while maintaining healthy margins for smaller purchases.

Stay vigilant after approval. Once your products are listed, regularly review your sales reports, discounting practices, and catalog entries – ideally every quarter. Make sure your GSA prices stay in line with your MFC practices and that no products fall outside their approved scope. Conduct internal audits and update your contract as needed to reflect changes in costs or product lines. This helps you avoid audit triggers and keeps your GSA Advantage! listings accurate and compliant.

For expert guidance, firms like GSA Focus can help you structure compliant pricing, validate SIN selections, and avoid errors that could delay or jeopardize your approval.

Trade Agreements Act and Compliance Problems

Building on the earlier discussion about documentation and authorization, ensuring compliance with the Trade Agreements Act (TAA) and verifying accurate country-of-origin claims are critical steps in crafting a successful GSA proposal. The TAA mandates that products must be either entirely made or substantially transformed in the United States or a designated country. Missteps in this area can result in audits, contract cancellations, or product removals. Just like pricing and documentation, TAA compliance is a cornerstone for maintaining the integrity of your GSA schedule and avoiding costly disruptions.

Offering Non-TAA-Compliant Products

Including products from non-designated countries in your offerings is a serious compliance issue. Countries such as China, India, and Russia fall outside the TAA’s designated list.

Submitting non-compliant products can lead to proposal rejections, forced product removals, and even contract cancellations. In fact, TAA non-compliance is one of the top triggers for audits during GSA Schedule reviews.

A common error vendors make is depending solely on supplier statements or distributor materials without conducting independent verification of TAA compliance. This practice frequently emerges as a root cause of violations during audits. Relying on a distributor’s claim is not enough – you must verify compliance on your own.

How can you ensure TAA compliance before listing products?

• Confirm the manufacturing or substantial transformation location directly with the manufacturer, and request supporting documentation such as certificates of origin or import records. Cross-check this information with the current TAA designated-country list before including the product in your proposal or catalog.
• Create a centralized compliance file for each product, organized by SKU or manufacturer part number. Regularly review and update this documentation, especially if production locations or suppliers change.

If a product originates from a non-designated country, you’ll need to replace it with a compliant alternative or remove it from your offerings. Screening all SKUs against the TAA country list and keeping detailed records of your decisions is crucial. During audits, contracting officers will expect you to demonstrate your due diligence.

For businesses with complex supply chains or limited compliance resources, consulting with a GSA specialist can help minimize risks. Experts like GSA Focus can assist in creating documentation workflows, reviewing product lists for potential TAA issues, and ensuring your catalog aligns with current regulations.

Incorrect Country of Origin Claims

Misrepresenting a product’s country of origin (COO) or making inaccurate "Made in USA" claims can result in proposal rejections and audit findings under the False Claims Act. These errors often happen when marketing teams rely on outdated branding language, packaging, or legacy materials instead of verified supply-chain data. Another frequent mistake is assuming that final packaging in the U.S. qualifies as substantial transformation when the product was actually manufactured elsewhere.

Even products assembled or finished in the U.S. may not qualify for "Made in USA" claims if substantial transformation didn’t occur domestically. Additionally, using a generic origin statement for a product line with variants manufactured in different countries can lead to compliance issues.

To avoid these pitfalls, implement these checks to ensure COO accuracy:

• Establish a cross-functional review process where compliance or contracts staff compare COO entries in GSA templates with verified records like ERP data, packaging proofs, and manufacturer certifications.
• Use a pre-submission checklist to flag any "Made in USA" or origin claims for further review, ensuring they align with verified manufacturing data.
• Regularly audit all "Made in USA" language across catalogs, GSA Advantage! listings, and other customer-facing materials, updating marketing copy as needed to reflect accurate information.

Training your sales, procurement, and contracts teams on TAA basics – such as understanding designated versus non-designated countries and the concept of substantial transformation – can further reduce the risk of COO errors.

Not Updating Compliance After Supplier Changes

Suppliers and manufacturers often change production locations, and failing to re-verify COO after such changes can turn a compliant product into a non-compliant one. A shift in supplier or factory location may result in production moving to a non-designated country or altering where substantial transformation occurs, instantly affecting the product’s TAA status. Assuming compliance based on an unchanged SKU or brand can be a costly mistake.

To address this risk, establish a formal change-control process:

• Require procurement or product managers to notify the compliance team before onboarding new suppliers or changing factories.
• Re-verify and document COO and TAA status after any supplier changes, ensuring updates are made to internal catalogs.
• Keep an auditable log of all changes.

Implementing mandatory reviews triggered by supplier switches, plant relocations, new models, or SKU substitutions ensures these checks are completed before products remain listed on your GSA schedule. Additionally, schedule periodic internal audits – ideally every quarter – to ensure COO data, TAA status, and manufacturer authorizations stay accurate throughout your supply chain.

Catalog Data and Submission Quality Problems

Once you’ve tackled TAA compliance and gathered the proper documentation, the next big challenge is ensuring your catalog data is accurate and submitted correctly. This step is crucial for securing GSA approval, as errors in catalog submissions are a common reason for rejections – over half of similar federal applications face rejection due to incomplete or incorrect documentation. Additionally, catalog inaccuracies can trigger audits, making ongoing maintenance a vital part of staying compliant.

Mismatched Catalog Data

When product information differs across your internal systems, commercial catalogs, and GSA submissions, it creates significant hurdles during the evaluation process. Contracting specialists need to confirm that the government is purchasing the correct product at the agreed price. Any discrepancies – whether in part numbers, product descriptions, or pricing – can lead to delays, additional reviews, or requests for clarification. For example, inconsistent product identifiers or descriptions can cause confusion and slow down approval.

A practical way to avoid these issues is by using a master catalog file. This file should include details like manufacturer names, part numbers, descriptions, units, prices, SIN assignments, COO (Country of Origin), TAA status, and contract references. To keep things organized:

• Restrict editing access to prevent unauthorized changes.
• Use version control to track updates.
• Implement validation rules, such as drop-down menus for SINs and standardized units of measure.

This master file ensures that every GSA submission, internal quote, and catalog update comes from a consistent and reliable source.

Before submitting your offer, consider a simple three-step cross-check process:

• Export ERP data and compare it against the pricing template.
• Spot-check high-value items for accuracy.
• Have an independent reviewer verify the data.

This approach helps catch errors early and speeds up the review process. Here’s a quick look at common catalog issues and how to address them:

Problem	Why It’s Problematic	Fix
Inconsistent part numbers	Difficult to verify correct product	Use standardized part numbers
Varying product descriptions	Creates confusion about product	Source from a single authoritative file
Mismatched pricing	Raises compliance concerns	Synchronize through a unified dataset

Addressing mismatches in product identifiers and descriptions is a critical first step.

Ignoring GSA Templates and VPP Requirements

GSA provides specific templates, such as price proposal templates and product data files, with clear instructions for required columns, naming conventions, and acceptable values. Deviating from these templates – whether by adding custom columns, altering headings, leaving fields blank, or using free-form text instead of required codes – can result in your submission being rejected outright. Reformatting and resubmitting files wastes time and resources.

For products under the VPP (Verified Products Portal), it’s essential to align your catalog data with the authoritative information provided by the manufacturer. Ensure that manufacturer part numbers, brands, and identifiers in your submission match exactly with the VPP data. If a manufacturer isn’t enrolled in the VPP or their data is incomplete, secure Letters of Supply and verify consistency across all documents.

To avoid issues:

• Follow GSA templates to the letter. Don’t modify column headings, skip required fields, or add extra elements unless explicitly instructed.
• Provide data exactly as requested. For example, if the template asks for "unit of issue", use that exact term, and when entering a numeric discount percentage, input just the number (e.g., "15") without symbols or additional text.

Many businesses streamline this process by mapping their internal data fields to GSA-required fields and automating the export process. This ensures consistency and reduces redundant work when product data changes.

Failing to Maintain Products After Approval

Even after approval, your catalog needs regular updates. Discontinued items often remain listed on GSA Advantage!, commercial price adjustments may not reflect in your GSA schedule, and products that were initially TAA-compliant might lose that status if manufacturing locations change. These lapses can lead to compliance risks, customer dissatisfaction, and even audits that result in product removal or contract termination.

To stay on top of things, establish a recurring catalog maintenance routine:

• Conduct a monthly review to remove discontinued items and ensure new products are correctly added or excluded from your GSA schedule.
• Perform a quarterly review to check pricing alignment, TAA compliance, and manufacturer authorizations.

Assign specific roles within your team to manage this process. For example:

• A contract manager to oversee GSA compliance.
• A data owner or analyst to maintain the master catalog file.
• An executive sponsor to approve major changes.

Use tools like spreadsheets with built-in validation, project management software to track updates, and documented procedures to handle product changes efficiently.

If your business has a large or frequently changing product catalog, is new to the GSA process, or has faced rejections or delays in the past, working with a specialist can be a game-changer. Experts like GSA Focus can help design compliant catalog structures, interpret template and VPP requirements, prepare and validate data files, and establish maintenance routines. This kind of support can lighten your workload, reduce submission errors, and help you take full advantage of federal contracting opportunities while staying compliant over the long term.

Conclusion

Getting a GSA product approval isn’t just about checking boxes – it’s about laying the groundwork for lasting success in the federal contracting space. Missteps like incomplete documentation or choosing the wrong SIN can create significant hurdles.

Errors can cost you time and money. A rejected proposal could delay your entry into the federal market by over a year. Even after approval, offering non-compliant products can lead to audits, hefty penalties, or even losing your contract altogether.

Staying compliant is worth the effort. Monitoring your sourcing for TAA eligibility, maintaining consistent pricing across all customers, and submitting reports on time helps you build a solid performance record. This not only supports contract renewals but also positions you for future opportunities.

To set yourself up for success, it’s crucial to prepare your processes thoroughly. Before applying, conduct a mock catalog review to ensure product descriptions, SIN alignment, and compliance documents are in order. Form a cross-functional team to audit your readiness and assign clear responsibilities for each requirement.

For small businesses, navigating GSA approval can feel overwhelming. That’s where GSA Focus comes in. They handle the heavy lifting – managing documentation, ensuring compliance, and simplifying negotiations. With a 98% success rate and services tailored specifically for small businesses, they help you avoid common mistakes and speed up the approval process. From interpreting solicitation requirements to structuring your offer and maintaining compliance, they ensure your contract remains both compliant and profitable over time.

FAQs

What are the common mistakes that lead to GSA product approval rejections, and how can I prevent them?

When navigating the GSA product approval process, one of the most common missteps businesses face is submitting incomplete or incorrect documentation. It’s crucial to make sure all required forms are fully completed and to review everything for missing details before hitting "submit."

Another frequent issue comes from not meeting GSA’s compliance standards. This can include providing inaccurate pricing information or failing to align your products with GSA’s specific requirements. A close review of the guidelines is essential to ensure your offerings and pricing meet their criteria.

To steer clear of these challenges, invest time in carefully preparing your application. If the process feels overwhelming, consider reaching out to professionals who specialize in GSA Schedule Contracts. Their expertise can make the process smoother and significantly increase your chances of getting approved.

What is the Trade Agreements Act (TAA), and how does it affect my product’s eligibility for GSA approval?

The Trade Agreements Act (TAA) sets strict guidelines for products listed on a GSA Schedule. Specifically, it requires that these products must either be manufactured in or undergo "substantial transformation" in a TAA-compliant country. In simpler terms, your product’s origin must trace back to the United States or one of the countries approved under the TAA.

To ensure your product aligns with these rules, start by checking the official list of TAA-designated countries. Confirm that your product’s country of origin matches the requirements. If it doesn’t, your product won’t qualify for GSA approval, potentially jeopardizing your contract.

Adhering to TAA regulations isn’t just a formality – it’s essential for keeping your GSA contract in good standing and steering clear of penalties. Always prioritize compliance to avoid unnecessary risks.

How can I ensure my pricing strategy complies with GSA requirements and avoids common mistakes?

To ensure your pricing strategy aligns with GSA requirements and steers clear of compliance issues, focus on keeping your pricing consistent, competitive, and transparent. The GSA mandates that your pricing must reflect your Most Favored Customer (MFC) rates. In simple terms, the government expects pricing that matches or beats what you offer to your best commercial customers.

It’s crucial to document all pricing justifications thoroughly, including any discounts or terms you may offer. Pay special attention to the Price Reduction Clause (PRC) – this clause requires you to notify the GSA if there are changes in your commercial pricing that could affect your GSA rates. Staying organized and proactive with your pricing details can save you from costly compliance mistakes.

Related Blog Posts

• Common GSA Compliance Mistakes And Fixes
• GSA Ordering Rules: What to Know
• GSA Contracting vs. Federal Bidding: Mistakes to Avoid
• How Proposal Errors Delay GSA Approval